🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are observing intently to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a increasing group of nations are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' youth". A law could be passed soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an similar ban could be "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to pass a law increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a related move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding statement supporting a ban for minors unless guardian approval is granted. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a solid starting point," said the European lawmaker behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any action must be "based on conclusive research".

Previously, support gathered behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the family of a young person who died after viewing dangerous social media material contends that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are safe and fit for young users," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, legislation is largely unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a law banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law capping minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures mandating adult authorization for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from some figures to mimic this lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, further countries are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global organizations strike a more nuanced tone. Unicef has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "might backfire". The agency points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in safety.

Even as this worldwide conversation evolves, the policies of this nation and several other countries indicate that states around the world are less and less content to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.