🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an charming small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a large but guardian-like friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a worm. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian amusement park have been caught in a tussle between a shuttered park, local and national governments and advocacy groups.

But those closest to the whales say the intense discussion over their fate often fails to consider the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been closely studied by the caretakers who interact with them daily.

After the Canadian government prevented the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held threatened to end their lives unless the government covers the upkeep of their survival. Canada’s marine resources official has refused that request, placing the thirty whales in an increasingly precarious circumstance.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Experts say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and group interactions suggest they are deeply intelligent mammals – something Kristy Burgess observed personally.

She spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a role that required earning the trust of the aquatic animals.

“Building up those relationships over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “In time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so wonderful and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the details and quirks in their characters. She cultivated a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with different personalities.

“Eve chose me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Each changed the way I perceive connection.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s relationship with the whales developed against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their confinement.

During her time at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s one orca, Kiska, succumbed. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a statistic which the park attributes to age-related causes, but which activists say reflects the inadequate care in which they were kept.

The park did not admit visitors to the public over the summer, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes effects of the closure. “Concrete is falling apart from the pools because they’re degrading and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and move about with pieces in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not respond to a inquiry, but earlier claimed: “The whales … obtain far higher quality medical attention and constant attention than any individual in the Britain, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was fired from the park in recent months following the death of a beluga, an sick beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the facility thought details of the incident were shared to the news outlets and she was released soon after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ future has left her and staff members in anguish. She says the facility’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” endeavor, adding any efforts to euthanize even a one beluga would require “considerable personnel”, vehicles and heavy equipment.

“It cannot happen in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess advocates for requests for the whales to be taken immediately from the facility, with its failing enclosures and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official rejected a proposal to transfer the whales to China.

“Allowing the application would have meant a perpetual life in captivity and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official wrote. “As the public, we know that whales belong in the wild, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing authorize an export that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But Burgess said the official’s statements indicate a more general lack of awareness of the circumstances of existence for belugas raised in confinement.

“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “People just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers work to find a answer, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have questionable practicality. One proposal called for the belugas to be freed into the wilds of northern regions – where whales are a key source of food for local populations.

A proposed protected area in the region of Nova Scotia, which has received official endorsement, has proven contentious. The future facility, which includes extensive space of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Advocates remain optimistic that it could ultimately represent a sustainable answer for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ future.

Others say the prospect of a sanctuary represents a worldwide trend away from captive facilities and could represent a feasible plan in the near future.

An official, head of the initiative, said the facility will replicate the intellectual stimulation and feeding regimen the whales get from trainers, albeit in a more expansive area. He said after the health of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|